A mission specialist for the company that owned the Titan submersible that imploded last year has told the US coast guard that the firm was staffed by competent people who wanted to “make dreams come true”.
Renata Rojas was the latest person connected to Titan owner OceanGate to give evidence as an investigatory panel listens to testimony that has raised questions about the company’s operations before the doomed mission.
British adventurer Hamish Harding and father and son Shahzada and Suleman Dawood died alongside OceanGate Expeditions’ chief executive Stockton Rush and Frenchman Paul-Henri Nargeolet when the submersible imploded en route to the site of the Titanic wreck in June 2023.
Mr Dawood was a London-based businessman and adviser to the King’s charity Prince’s Trust International, with a focus on its work in Pakistan. His 19-year-old son was a student at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow.
Ms Rojas’ testimony began with a different tone than some of the earlier witnesses, who described the company as troubled from the top down and focused more on profit than science or safety.
“I was learning a lot and working with amazing people,” Ms Rojas said.
“Some of those people are very hard working individuals that were just trying to make dream come true.”
Ms Rojas also said she felt the company was sufficiently transparent during the run-up to the Titanic dive. Her evidence was emotional at times, with the coast guard panel proposing a brief break at one point so she could collect herself.
“I knew what I was doing was very risky. I never at any point felt unsafe by the operation,” she said.
Earlier this month, the coast guard opened a public hearing that is part of a high-level investigation into the cause of the implosion.
The public hearing began on September 16 and some of the testimony has focused on problems the company had prior to the fatal 2023 dive.
During the hearing, former OceanGate operations director David Lochridge said he frequently clashed with Mr Rush and felt the company was committed only to making money.
“The whole idea behind the company was to make money,” Mr Lochridge said. “There was very little in the way of science.”
Also expected to give evidence on Thursday is former OceanGate scientific director Steven Ross.
The hearing is expected to run through to Friday with more witnesses still to come and resume next week.
Mr Lochridge and other witnesses have painted a picture of a company led by people who were impatient to get the unconventionally designed craft into the water.
The deadly accident set off a worldwide debate about the future of private undersea exploration.
Coast guard officials noted at the start of the hearing that the submersible had not been independently reviewed, as is standard practice.
That and Titan’s unusual design subjected it to scrutiny in the undersea exploration community.
OceanGate, based in Washington state, suspended its operations after the implosion.
The company has no full-time employees currently, but has been represented by an attorney during the hearing.
During the submersible’s final dive on June 18, 2023, the crew lost contact after an exchange of texts about the Titan’s depth and weight as it descended.
The support ship Polar Prince then sent repeated messages asking if the Titan could still see the ship on its onboard display.
One of the last messages from Titan’s crew to Polar Prince before the submersible imploded stated “all good here”, according to a visual recreation presented earlier in the hearing.
When the submersible was reported missing, rescuers rushed ships, planes and other equipment to an area about 435 miles south of St John’s, Newfoundland.
Four days later, wreckage of the Titan was subsequently found on the ocean floor about 330 yards (300 metres) off the bow of the Titanic, coast guard officials said.
Nobody on board survived.
OceanGate said it has been fully co-operating with the coast guard and NTSB investigations since they began.
The Titan had been making voyages to the Titanic wreckage site going back to 2021.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here